What the conversation means
Being invited to a without prejudice conversation at work can come as a shock, particularly if you were not expecting it. Many employees worry that dismissal is around the corner, while others are unsure what the phrase even means. In reality, it is a commonly used legal tool that allows employers and employees to discuss resolving a workplace dispute, often through a settlement agreement.
A without prejudice conversation usually takes place where there is an existing disagreement or potential dispute. The aim is to explore whether the issue can be resolved without a formal disciplinary process or an employment tribunal claim. What is said cannot usually be relied on as evidence in later proceedings, which encourages open discussion of compensation, notice arrangements and agreed exit terms.
That protection is not automatic or unlimited. There must be a real dispute, and the discussion must be conducted appropriately. Threats, undue pressure, discrimination or misleading statements can remove the protection. Separately, the law allows protected conversations about ending employment under section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but these only apply to ordinary unfair dismissal claims.
If you are invited to one of these meetings, remain calm and seek legal advice urgently. These conversations can work in your favour, but only if handled properly and with a clear understanding of your legal position. You do not have to agree anything in the meeting itself, and any proposal can be put in writing for you to take advice on.
What we do for you
- Usually linked to an offer of a settlement agreement
- Protection depends on a real dispute and fair conduct
- Pressure, threats or discrimination can remove the protection
- You do not have to agree anything in the meeting
- Take advice before you respond to any offer